The Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”), which received the
assent of the President of India last year, has introduced two important
concepts in (Indian) Company Law Jurisprudence – Small Company and One Person Company
(“OPC”). As can be understood from the reply of Sachin Pilot, Minister of State
(I/C) Corporate Affairs, to Starred Question no. 507 (2nd May, 2013, Lok Sabha) and
Unstarred Question no. 90 (5th Dec., 2013, Lok Sabha), the concept
of ‘small company’, along with ‘one person company’, have been introduced to allow new entrepreneurs to take
advantage of corporate form of business. In the Companies Act, 1956
(“1956 Act”), there were no such concept(s) and those, intending to incorporate
a business entity under the 1956 Act, had the option to incorporate companies
in other forms.
Both Small Company and OPC are special form of
private companies. While existence of the former company is determined in
accordance with the value of share
capital or turnover, existence of
the latter company is determined in accordance with the number of members. There can also be a
possibility where both the forms of companies may overlap. For instance, consider
a situation where an OPC also satisfies the definition of a Small Company.
These companies are different from other companies because of the simplified
procedure available for them, both in terms of administration and responsibilities.
The 21st Report [Companies Bill, 2009 (“2009 Bill”)] of the
Standing Committee on Finance noticed that the 2009 Bill contained scattered
provisions for providing exemptions to OPC and Small Companies [see: clause 421, 2009 Bill – it was later
removed]. While Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) was of the opinion that
further exemptions, if any, could be provided vide notifications, the Standing
Committee opined that such exemptions should be provided in the bill itself. In
fact, Standing Committee recommended that such exemptions should be provided by
way of a schedule or be appended to
the main Act. Once again in its 57th Report [Companies Bill, 2011 (“2011 Bill”), the Standing
Committee reiterated that exemptions available to different
classes of companies should be clearly specified.