Showing posts with label World Trade Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World Trade Law. Show all posts

Friday, February 14, 2014

US to initiate WTO action against India’s ‘Domestic Content Requirement’ in Solar Mission

In a recent move, United States has sought to initiate World Trade Organisation (“WTO”) dispute settlement consultations with India concerning ‘domestic content requirement’ (“DCR”) in Phase-II of India’s national solar mission. This is the second time when US has initiated WTO action against India’s Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission – the first action was brought in February 2013 against similar DCR in Phase-I of Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (“JNNSM”).

In a statement issued by the Office of United States Trade Representative (“USTR”), it has been contended that DCR under JNNSM is against the obligations contemplated under General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs, 1994 (“GATT”), Agreement on Trade Related Investment Measures (“TRIMs”) and Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (“SCM”). Under WTO dispute settlement mechanism, consultation is the initial step which a member state can resorts to.

In this blog post, I have explained what DCR or domestic/local content requirements are, relevant description of JNNSM and relevant WTO provisions concerning the present case.

What is ‘Domestic’ or ‘Local’ Content Requirement?

‘Local Content Requirement’ can be understood as a regulation that requires a specified fraction of a final good, work or service to be sourced domestically. Article 7.2 of EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement defines the phrase as a requirement for an enterprise to purchase or use goods of domestic origin. In other words, where a state imposes an obligation to have ‘local content’ in product or service, producers (both domestic and international) would mandatorily be required to source specified quantity of local content.

However, in a statement published by USTR, local content requirement or DCR has been described as the obligation to produce content locally. It has been described in the following terms:

“ ........require businesses to produce a certain level of content (materials, parts, etc.) within the country where the end product will be sold.”

The above description, as provided by USTR, has been doubted in a blog post. For the purpose of present dispute, DCR should be understood as a condition which requires developers to use specified quantity of domestically manufactured content.

Though the objective of DCR may vary, it is generally accepted that DCR measures seek to encourage domestic industry and further seek to increase employment. In fields such as solar energy, initial governmental support is required for the existence of firms and development of proper infrastructure. Usually, the government support is also required for the innovation at domestic level. Equally forceful arguments are available against the usage of measures such as DCR – one of them being that DCR increases the cost of solar energy.  

The usage of DCR measures vary from country to country depending on factors such as but not limited to technology, infrastructure, financial stability etc.